Overview
This page contains Dr. Bannon's reading of Socrates' 'Great Speech' from Plato's Phaedrus — the palinode that defines the Whole Soul and gives the Allegory of the Chariot. The Great Speech is the culminating text of the course: it defines philosophy itself as 'a mode of discourse for the sake of training the intellect by cultivating a desire for wisdom through inSpiration.' For the lecture context, see Chapter 10.
Key Concepts
- Socrates gives his speech 'with head bare, no longer covered in shame'
- The definition of the Whole Soul (hole psyche)
- The Allegory of the Chariot: the tripartite soul — Intellect (charioteer), Logic and Desire (two horses)
- Eros as divine madness: a gift from the gods that inSpires toward wisdom
- The Great Speech's definition of philosophy: 'a mode of discourse for the sake of training the intellect by cultivating a desire for wisdom through inSpiration'
- Second half of the dialogue: rhetoric as healing; Logic and Desire in relation to Truth
Vocabulary & Glossary
- Whole Soul (Hole Psyche)The soul in which intellect, logic, and desire are rightly ordered — all three moving together toward Truth and Justice
- Tripartite SoulPlato's model: the soul has three parts — intellect (charioteer), logic (white horse), desire (black horse)
- Divine Madness (Theia Mania)The four forms of sacred madness — prophecy, healing, art, and Eros — gifts from the gods that lift us above mere rationality
Key Examples & Analogies
The soul is like a charioteer driving two winged horses. The charioteer represents the intellect — the decision-maker. The white horse is noble and responsive to reason (logic). The black horse is unruly and driven by appetite (desire). Philosophy trains the charioteer and the horses so that all three move harmoniously toward the Beautiful.
Exam Prep Questions
- What is the Allegory of the Chariot? What do the charioteer and each horse represent?
- What is Socrates' definition of the Whole Soul?
- What is the Great Speech's definition of philosophy?
- How does the Great Speech differ from Socrates' earlier (covered-head) speech?
Lecture Transcript
[00:00:05]If you wish to reach a good decision on any topic, my boy, there is only one way to begin: [00:00:10]You must first know what the decision is about, or else you are bound to miss your target altogether. [00:00:16]Ordinary people cannot see that they do not know the true nature of a particular subject, but they proceed as if they did; [00:00:25]and because they do not work out an agreement at the start of the inquiry, they wind up as you would expect—in conflict with themselves and each other. [00:00:35]Now you and I had better not let this happen to us, since we criticize it in others.
[00:00:40]Because you and I are about to discuss whether a boy should make friends with a man who loves him rather than with one who does not, [00:00:51]Therefore, we should agree on defining what love is and what effects it has. [00:00:56]That way, we can look back and refer to this definition as we try to find out whether to expect benefit or harm from love. [00:01:06]Now, as everyone plainly knows, love is some kind of desire; [00:01:11]but we also know that even men who are not in love have a desire for what is beautiful.
[00:01:17]So how shall we distinguish between these two--the one who is in love and the one who is not in love? [00:01:22]We must realize that [00:01:38]Sometimes these two are in agreement; but there are times when they quarrel within us, [00:01:43]Sometimes one gaining control, sometimes the other gaining control. [00:01:48]Now when judgment is in control and leads us by reasoning toward what is best,
[00:01:55]that sort of self-control is called ‘being in your right mind’; [00:01:59]but when desire takes command in us and drags us without reasoning toward pleasure, [00:02:04]then its command is known as ‘outrageousness’. [00:02:08]Now outrageousness has as many names as the forms it can take, and these are quite diverse. [00:02:15]Whichever form stands out in a particular case gives its name to the person who has it—
[00:02:21]and that is not a pretty name to be called, not worth earning at all. [00:02:26]For example: [00:02:27]If it is desire for food that overpowers a person’s reasoning about what is best [00:02:33]and suppresses their other desires, it is called gluttony and we give to him the name of: "glutton," [00:02:40]while if it is desire for drink that plays the tyrant and leads the man in that direction, well, we all know what name we’ll call him then!
[00:02:49][Cheers!] [00:02:51]And now it should be clear how to describe someone appropriately in all these other cases: [00:02:56]call that man by that name—sister to the other ones—that derives from the sister of these desires that controls him at that moment. [00:03:06]As for this desire that has led us to say all these things, it should be obvious already, [00:03:11]but I suppose that things said are better understood than things unsaid:
[00:03:16]So here is our definition of "Eros"... [00:03:50]There, my friend Phaedrus, don’t you think, as I do, that I’m in the grip of something divine? [00:03:55]This is certainly an unusual flow of words for you, Socrates. [00:03:59]Then be quiet and listen. [00:04:01]There’s something really divine about this place,
[00:04:04]so don’t be surprised if I’m quite taken by the Nymphs’ madness as I go on with the speech. [00:04:10]I’m on the edge of speaking in dithyrambs as it is. [00:04:13]Very true! [00:04:15]Yes, and you’re the cause of it. But hear me out; the attack may yet be prevented. [00:04:20]That, however, is up to God;
[00:04:22]what we must do is face the boy again in the speech: [00:04:26]All right then, my brave friend, now we have a definition for the subject of our decision; [00:04:32]now we have said what it really is; [00:04:35]so let us keep that in view as we complete our discussion. [00:04:40]What benefit or harm is likely to come from the lover or the non-lover to the boy who gives him favors?
[00:04:49]It is surely necessary that a man who is ruled by desire and is a slave to pleasure [00:04:55]will turn his boy into whatever is most pleasing to himself. [00:04:59]Now a sick man takes pleasure in anything that does not resist him, [00:05:03]but sees anyone who is equal or superior to him as an enemy. [00:05:08]That is why a lover will not willingly put up with a boyfriend who is his equal or his superior,
[00:05:15]but is always working to make the boy he loves weaker and inferior to himself. [00:05:20]Now, the ignorant man is inferior to the wise one, the coward inferior to the brave, [00:05:26]the ineffective speaker to the trained orator, the slow-witted to the quick-witted. [00:05:32]By necessity, a lover will be delighted to find these mental defects and more, [00:05:38]whether acquired or innate in his boy;
[00:05:41]and if he does not, he will have to supply them or else lose the pleasure of the moment. [00:05:47]The necessary consequence is that he will be jealous and keep the boy away from the good company of anyone who would make a better man out of him; [00:05:58]and that will cause him a great deal of harm, especially if he keeps him away from what would most improve his mind— [00:06:06]and that, of course, is divine philosophy, [00:06:11]from which it is necessary for a lover to keep his boy away... a great distance away,
[00:06:17]out of fear that the boy will eventually come to look down on him. [00:06:22]He will have to invent other ways, too, of keeping the boy in total ignorance [00:06:26]and therefore in total dependence on himself. [00:06:30]That way, the boy will give his lover the most pleasure, though the harm to himself will be severe. [00:06:39]So it will not be of any use to your intellectual development to have as your mentor and companion a man who is in love.
[00:06:49]Now let’s turn to your physical development. [00:06:52]If a man is bound by necessity to chase pleasure at the expense of the good, [00:06:58]what sort of shape will he want you to be in? [00:07:01]How will he train you, if he is in charge? [00:07:04]You will see that what he wants is someone who is soft, not muscular,
[00:07:08]and not trained in full sunlight but trained in dappled shade— [00:07:12]Instead, he goes for a boy who has known only a soft unmanly style of life, [00:07:18]who makes himself pretty with cosmetics because he has no natural color at all. [00:07:25]There is no point in going on with this description: [00:07:28]it is perfectly obvious what sorts of behavior will follow from this.
[00:07:32]the sort of body a lover wants in his boy is one that will give confidence to the enemy in a war or other great crisis [00:07:40]while causing alarm to his friends, his family, and even to his lovers. [00:07:46]Enough of that; the point is obvious. [00:07:49]Our next topic will be the benefit or harm to your possessions that will come from a lover’s care and company. [00:07:56]Everyone knows the answer, especially a lover:
[00:08:00]His first wish will be for a boy who has lost his dearest, kindliest, and godliest possessions— [00:08:07]Namely, his mother, his father, and other close relatives. [00:08:11]He would be happy to see the boy deprived of them, [00:08:15]since he would expect them either to block him from the sweet pleasure of the boy’s company [00:08:20]or to criticize him severely for taking it.
[00:08:23]What is more, a lover would think any money or other wealth the boy owns [00:08:28]would only make him harder to snare and, once snared, harder to handle. [00:08:33]It follows by absolute necessity that wealth in a boyfriend will cause his lover to envy him, [00:08:40]while his poverty will be a delight. [00:08:43]Furthermore, he will wish for the boy to stay wifeless, childless, and homeless for as long as possible,
[00:08:50]since that’s how long he desires to go on plucking his sweet fruit. [00:08:56]There are other troubles in life, of course, but some divinity has mixed them with a dash of immediate pleasure. [00:09:03]A flatterer, for example, may be an awful beast and a dreadful nuisance, [00:09:08]but nature makes flattery rather pleasant by mixing in a little culture with its words. [00:09:14]So it is also with a mistress—for all the harm we accuse her of causing—
[00:09:19]and with many other creatures of that character, and their callings: [00:09:25]at least they are delightful company for a day. [00:09:29]But besides being harmful to his boyfriend, a lover is simply disgusting to spend the day with. [00:09:35]“Youth delights youth,” as the old proverb goes— [00:09:38]because, I suppose, friendship grows from similarity, as boys of the same age chase after the same kinds of pleasures.
[00:09:46]But you can even have too much of people your own age. [00:09:49]Besides, as they say, it is miserable for anyone to be forced into anything by necessity— [00:09:56]and this (to say nothing of the age difference) is most true for the boy of his lover. [00:10:03]The older man clings to the younger day and night, never willing to leave him alone, [00:10:10]driven by necessity and goaded on by the
[00:10:13]Sting that gives him pleasure every time he sees, hears, touches, or perceives his boy in any way at all, [00:10:19]so that he follows him around like a servant, with pleasure. [00:10:25]As for the boy, however, what comfort or pleasure will the lover give to him during all the time they spend together? [00:10:32]Won’t it be disgusting in the extreme to see the face of that older man who’s lost his looks? [00:10:41]And everything that goes with that face—
[00:10:44]Why, it’s even miserable to hear them mentioned, let alone actually have to handle them, as you would constantly be forced to do! [00:10:54]To be watched and guarded suspiciously all the time, with everyone! [00:10:58]To hear praise of yourself that is out of place and excessive! [00:11:02]And then to be falsely accused— [00:11:05]which is unbearable when the man is sober
[00:11:08]and not only unbearable but positively shameful [00:11:11]when he is drunk and lays into you with a pack of wild barefaced insults! [00:11:17]While he is still in love he is harmful and disgusting, [00:11:21]but after his love fades he breaks his trust with you for the future, [00:11:27]in spite of all the promises he has made with all those oaths and entreaties which just barely kept you in a relationship that was troublesome at the time,
[00:11:35]in hope of future benefits. [00:11:38]So, then, by the time he should pay up, [00:11:41]he has made a change and installed a [00:11:48]right-minded reason in place of the madness of love. [00:11:53]The boy does not even realize that his lover is a different man.
[00:11:57]He insists on his reward for past favors [00:12:01]and reminds him of what they had done and said before— [00:12:05]as if he were still talking to the same man! [00:12:08]The lover, however, is so ashamed that he does not dare tell the boy how much he has changed [00:12:14]or that there is no way—
[00:12:17]now that he is in his right mind and under control again— [00:12:20]that he can stand by the promises he had sworn to uphold when he was under that old mindless regime. [00:12:27]He is afraid that if he acted as he had before he would turn out the same and revert to his old self. [00:12:36]So now he is a refugee, fleeing from those old promises on which he must default by necessity; [00:12:43]he, the former lover, has to switch roles and flee, since the coin has fallen the other way,
[00:12:51]while the boy must chase after him, angry and cursing. [00:12:55]All along, he has been completely unaware that he should never have given his favors to a man who was in love— [00:13:03]and who therefore had by necessity lost his mind. [00:13:09]He should much rather have done it for a man who was not in love and had his wits about him. [00:13:15]Otherwise, it follows necessarily that he’d be giving himself to a man who is deceitful,
[00:13:21]irritable, jealous, disgusting, harmful to his property, [00:13:27]harmful to his physical fitness, and absolutely devastating to the cultivation of his soul, [00:13:35]which truly is, and will always be, the most valuable thing to gods and men. [00:13:42]These are the points you should bear in mind, my boy. [00:13:47]You should know that the friendship of a lover arises without any good will at all.
[00:13:53]No, like food, its purpose is to sate hunger. [00:13:58]‘Do wolves love lambs? That’s how lovers befriend a boy!’ [00:14:05]That’s it, Phaedrus. You won’t hear another word from me, and you’ll have to accept this as the end of the speech. [00:14:12]But I thought you were right in the middle— [00:14:16]I thought you were about to speak at the same length about the non-lover,
[00:14:21]to list his good points and argue that it’s better to give one’s favors to him. [00:14:25]So why are you stopping now, Socrates? [00:14:28]Didn’t you notice, my friend, [00:14:30]that even though I am criticizing the lover, I have passed beyond lyric into epic poetry? [00:14:37]What do you suppose will happen to me if I begin to praise his opposite?
[00:14:42]Don’t you realize that the Nymphs to whom you so cleverly exposed me will take complete possession of me? [00:14:49]So I say instead, in a word, that every shortcoming for which we blamed the lover has its contrary advantage, and the non-lover possesses it. [00:14:56]Why make a long speech of it? That’s enough about them both. [00:15:00]This way my story will meet the end it deserves, [00:15:02]and I will cross the river and leave before you make me do something even worse.
[00:15:07]Not yet, Socrates, not until this heat is over. [00:15:11]Don’t you see that it is almost exactly noon, [00:15:13]“straight-up” as they say? [00:15:18]Let’s wait and discuss the speeches, and go as soon as it turns cooler. [00:15:23]You’re really superhuman when it comes to speeches, Phaedrus;
[00:15:26]you’re truly amazing. [00:15:28]I’m sure you’ve brought into being more of the speeches that have been given during your lifetime than anyone else, [00:15:34]whether you composed them yourself or in one way or another forced others to make them; [00:15:39]with the single exception of Simmias the Theban, you are far ahead of the rest. [00:15:43]Even as we speak, I think, you’re managing to cause me to produce yet another one.
[00:15:50]Oh, how wonderful! [00:15:54]But what do you mean? What speech? [00:15:57]My friend, just as I was about to cross the river, the familiar divine sign came to me [00:16:02]which, whenever it occurs, holds me back from something I am about to do. [00:16:07]I thought I heard a voice coming from this very spot,
[00:16:12]forbidding me to leave until I made atonement for some offense against God. [00:16:17]In effect, you see, I am a seer, and though I am not particularly good at it, [00:16:21]Still—just like people who are just barely able to read and write—I am good enough for my own purposes. [00:16:26]I recognize my offense clearly now. [00:16:29]In fact, the soul too, my friend, is itself a sort of seer;
[00:16:34]that’s why, almost from the beginning of my speech, [00:16:37]I was disturbed by a very uneasy feeling, [00:16:41]as Ibycus puts it, that “for offending God, I am honored by men.” [00:16:45]But now I understand exactly what my offense was. [00:16:50]Tell me, what is it?
[00:16:52]Phaedrus, that speech you carried with you here—it was horrible, as horrible as the speech you made me give. [00:17:03]But how could that be? [00:17:05]It was foolish, and close to being impious. [00:17:08]What could be more horrible than that? [00:17:10]Nothing—if, of course, what you say is right.
[00:17:15]Well, then? Don’t you believe that Love is the son of Aphrodite? [00:17:19]Isn’t he one of the gods? [00:17:21]Well, certainly that is what people say. [00:17:24]Well, Lysias certainly doesn’t and neither does your speech, [00:17:28]which you charmed me through your potion into delivering myself.
[00:17:32]But if Love is a god or something divine—which he is— [00:17:37]he can’t be bad in any way; and yet our speeches just now spoke of him as if he were. [00:17:43]That is an offense against Love. [00:17:47]You are a murderer of Love! [00:17:52]And they’ve compounded it with their utterfoolishness in parading their dangerous falsehoods and
[00:17:57]preening themselves over perhaps deceiving a few silly people and coming to be admired by them. [00:18:04]And so, my friend, I must purify myself. [00:18:07]Now for those whose offense lies in telling false stories about matters divine, [00:18:12]there is an ancient rite of purification— [00:18:15]Homer did not know it, but Stesichorus did.
[00:18:19]When he lost his sight for speaking ill of Helen, he did not, like Homer, remain in the dark about the reason why. [00:18:28]On the contrary, true follower of the Muses that he was, he understood it and immediately composed these lines: [00:18:35]There’s no truth to that story: You never sailed that lovely ship, You never reached the tower of Troy. [00:18:41]And as soon as he completed the poem we call the Palinode, he immediately regained his sight. [00:18:49]Now I will prove to be wiser than Homer and Stesichorus to this small extent:
[00:18:57]I will try to offer my Palinode to Love before I am punished for speaking ill of him— [00:19:05]with my head bare, no longer covered in shame. [00:19:10]No words could be sweeter to my ears, Socrates. [00:19:15]You see, my dear Phaedrus, you understand how shameless the speeches were, my own as well as the one in your book. [00:19:24]Suppose a noble and gentle man, who was (or had once been) in love with a boy of similar character,
[00:19:32]were to hear us say that lovers start serious quarrels over trivial reasons and that, [00:19:40]jealous of their beloved, they do him harm— [00:19:43]don’t you think that man would think we had been brought up among the most vulgar of sailors, [00:19:48]totally ignorant of love among the freeborn? [00:19:52]Wouldn’t he most certainly refuse to acknowledge the flaws we attributed to Love?
[00:19:57]Most probably, Socrates. [00:20:00]Well, that man makes me feel ashamed, and [00:20:03]as I’m also afraid of Love himself, [00:20:04]I want to wash out the bitterness of what we’ve heard with a more tasteful speech. [00:20:10]And my advice to Lysias, too,
[00:20:12]is that he write a speech as soon as possible urging one to give similar favors to a lover rather than to a non-lover. [00:20:20]You can be sure he will. [00:20:22]For once you have spoken in praise of the lover, [00:20:26]I will most definitely make Lysias write a speech on the same topic. [00:20:32]I do believe you will, as long as you are who you are.
[00:20:36]Speak on, then, in full confidence. [00:20:40]Where is the boy -- the boy to whom I was speaking? [00:20:43]Let him hear this speech, too. [00:20:45]Otherwise he might be too quick to give his favors to a non-lover. [00:20:49]He is here, always right by your side, whenever you want him.
[00:20:57]You’ll have to understand, beautiful boy, that the previous speech [00:21:01]was by Phaedrus, Pythocles’ son, from Myrrhinus, [00:21:05]while the one I am about to give is by Stesichorus, Euphemus’ son, from Himera. [00:21:12]And here is how the speech should go: [00:21:17]Long speech [stay tuned for part 4!]