Overview
Chapter 4b deepens the existential analysis by examining Buddha's philosophy in detail. Drawing on Aśvaghoṣa's Buddhacarita, Dr. Bannon traces the Buddha's path from existential crisis to enlightenment, then introduces the Buddhist doctrines of Mutual Arising and No-Self (AnAtman) — and their implications for the relationship between mind and thought.
Key Concepts
- Existential Purpose: philosophy asks not just 'what is true?' but 'what should I do with this life?'
- Buddha's Existential Crisis: awakening to the reality of suffering and impermanence
- Buddha's Anthropology, Ontology, Epistemology: an integrated vision of human nature, reality, and knowledge
- Asvaghosa's Buddhacarita: the classic Sanskrit biography of the Buddha's enlightenment
- Buddhi / Buddha-ness: buddhi = intellect/awakening faculty; the Buddha is the one who has fully awakened buddhi
- Tracing the Cause of Suffering: the Buddha's method is phenomenological — trace suffering to its root
- The 'Cut' (revisited): the distinction between surface phenomena and underlying reality
- Cognition and Names & Forms: how the mind constructs the 'self' through naming and categorizing
- Doctrine of Mutual Arising (Pratītyasamutpāda): nothing exists independently; all things arise together in interdependence
- Doctrine of No-Self (AnAtman): the 'self' is a constructed fiction; there is no unchanging personal essence
- Atman vs. AnAtman: the Hindu/Vedic concept of a permanent self (Atman) versus the Buddhist denial of it
- Ontological Co-Dependence of Mind and Thought: mind and its objects arise together — neither precedes the other
- Nirvana: literally 'blowing out' — the extinction of craving; liberation from the cycle of suffering
- Birth and Death Redefined: in Buddhist thought, birth/death occur moment to moment, not just biologically
- The Movie Theater Allegory: we mistake the projected images (thoughts) for the screen itself (pure awareness)
Vocabulary & Glossary
- BuddhiSanskrit: the intellect or awakening faculty; the capacity for discernment and wisdom
- PratītyasamutpādaDoctrine of Mutual/Dependent Arising: all phenomena arise in dependence on other phenomena; nothing is self-sufficient
- AnAtmanBuddhist doctrine of No-Self: there is no unchanging, independent personal essence or soul
- AtmanThe Hindu/Vedic concept of the true self — the eternal, unchanging soul within each person
- NirvanaLiterally 'blowing out'; the liberation from suffering through the extinguishing of craving and ignorance
- Names and Forms (Nāmarūpa)The cognitive act of categorizing experience through language and perception — the constructed 'self' arises through naming
- CognitionThe mental act of knowing; in Buddhist thought, cognition always involves a subject and an object arising together
Key Examples & Analogies
We sit in a dark theater watching images projected onto a screen. If we forget the screen and identify entirely with the images, we suffer with every dramatic scene. The screen itself is never touched by the images. In Buddhist thought: the mind (screen) is pure awareness; thoughts (images) come and go. We mistake the thoughts for who we are.
Biologically, we are born once and die once. But philosophically, every moment involves the 'death' of a prior state and the 'birth' of a new one. The self that existed a year ago no longer exists in the same form. This is mutual arising: the self is not a fixed thing but a flowing process.
Exam Prep Questions
- What is the doctrine of Mutual Arising (Pratītyasamutpāda)? How does it challenge our ordinary sense of having a fixed self?
- What is the Buddhist doctrine of No-Self (AnAtman)? How does it differ from the Hindu concept of Atman?
- How does the Movie Theater Allegory illuminate the Buddhist understanding of the relationship between mind and thought?
- In what sense does Dr. Bannon say 'birth and death are redefined' in Buddhist thought? What does this mean philosophically?
- What is Nirvana, and why is it the goal of Buddhist philosophy?
Lecture Transcript
[00:00:01]Howdy y’all [00:00:02]Welcome back. [00:00:02]And namaste. [00:00:04]I want to zoom out here [00:00:05]and help
[00:00:06]you see the bigger picture of what [00:00:07]I'm trying to paint for you. [00:00:09]Now, we're still in chapter [00:00:10]four of this philosophical quest, [00:00:12]which is called setting course
[00:00:14]intercourse, discourse and death. [00:00:18]Setting course is what you do [00:00:19]when you pick your goal, [00:00:21]your destination. [00:00:22]Once you know where you're trying to go,
[00:00:25]once you know where you're heading, [00:00:26]then you set course [00:00:28]or you set, you're [00:00:28]heading towards that goal. [00:00:30]Now, most people,
[00:00:32]especially when they're young, [00:00:33]tend to be a little aimless. [00:00:36]They don't get anywhere in life [00:00:37]because they have short attention spans. [00:00:40]They set their short
[00:00:41]term goals [00:00:42]and they, [00:00:42]you know, [00:00:43]jump from one thing to the next. [00:00:45]And don't get me wrong,
[00:00:46]I'm not judging or criticizing. [00:00:48]You do you. [00:00:49]I've been there. [00:00:50]I'm just trying to observe [00:00:52]what I've noticed over
[00:00:53]my 48 years on this planet. [00:00:55]Now, sometimes an otherwise [00:00:58]aimless individual [00:00:59]has a profound encounter [00:01:01]with the reality of death.
[00:01:04]Often this happens [00:01:05]when someone close to them dies. [00:01:06]It could be a family member, [00:01:08]it could be a friend, a neighbor, [00:01:10]or even a pet or a celebrity
[00:01:12]that they admire, like [00:01:13]Kobe Bryant or Mac [00:01:15]Miller, Cameron Boyce, [00:01:16]Takeoff or Juice Wrld. [00:01:19]To a lesser extent,
[00:01:20]it could even be the death [00:01:21]of a fictional character [00:01:22]like Dumbledore or Mufasa. [00:01:24]Now, of course, a near-death experience [00:01:26]such as a car crash or a mass
[00:01:28]shooting at your school [00:01:29]or a terrorist attack on your office [00:01:31]building [00:01:32]can have a similar and often [00:01:34]more profound effect.
[00:01:36]We generally call this [00:01:37]an existential crisis. [00:01:39]It causes someone to have [00:01:40]a meaningful reflection [00:01:41]on the reality of death,
[00:01:43]which causes them to think about, [00:01:45]you know, [00:01:45]what actually matters in life [00:01:47]and what doesn't. [00:01:49]In some cases,
[00:01:50]this existential reflection [00:01:52]on death [00:01:52]causes them to set course [00:01:54]to set goals and principles in their life [00:01:56]that begin to govern
[00:01:58]how they live their life. [00:02:00]Now, different [00:02:00]philosophers use different words [00:02:02]to describe this. [00:02:03]Some call it an existential purpose.
[00:02:06]Others [00:02:06]call it a vocation, [00:02:08]which is a Latin word for calling. [00:02:10]So a vocation is something [00:02:12]that you are called to do.
[00:02:14]Japanese philosophers [00:02:15]use this word ikigai, [00:02:17]which is something that stands [00:02:18]at the intersection [00:02:19]of what you're good at,
[00:02:20]what you're [00:02:20]passionate about, [00:02:21]what the world around [00:02:23]you needs to be done. [00:02:25]Indian philosophers
[00:02:26]use the word swadharma, [00:02:28]which is a dharma [00:02:29]that the world needs to be done, [00:02:31]which you have particular skill, [00:02:33]talents, gifts and passion
[00:02:35]for doing. For some folks [00:02:37]discerning their existential purpose [00:02:39]or vocation [00:02:40]or ikigai or swadharma or whatever [00:02:42]you want to call it.
[00:02:43]For some folks, [00:02:43]it's easy to discern [00:02:45]what their existential purpose is. [00:02:46]You know, [00:02:47]maybe they're a victim of trauma,
[00:02:48]so they devote their life [00:02:49]to helping others [00:02:50]who are trauma survivors. [00:02:52]Maybe they take great joy from healing [00:02:54]and comforting people who are ill,
[00:02:56]so they become a doctor [00:02:58]or a nurse or a psychologist [00:03:00]for other folks. [00:03:01]It takes time and life [00:03:03]experience to figure out
[00:03:05]what their existential purpose [00:03:06]or a calling or vocation is regardless. [00:03:09]One thing is clear to me [00:03:11]If you truly figure out [00:03:12]what your existential purpose in life is,
[00:03:15]it has a significant impact [00:03:17]on the major decisions [00:03:18]that you make in life. [00:03:20]Using your college years [00:03:21]to try and figure out what that is is
[00:03:25]wise. [00:03:27]As I've emphasized many times before, [00:03:29]philosophy is a mode of discourse [00:03:31]for the sake of training the intellect [00:03:33]by cultivating a desire
[00:03:35]for truth, [00:03:35]wisdom, and justice through inspiration. [00:03:39]The intellect is [00:03:40]the part of the human person [00:03:41]that makes decisions.
[00:03:42]And when we have meaningful discourse [00:03:44]about the reality of death, [00:03:46]we begin to realize [00:03:47]what is actually important to us in life [00:03:50]and what isn't.
[00:03:52]What begins as an existential crisis [00:03:55]can evolve [00:03:55]into an existential discernment, [00:03:58]a discernment of what [00:03:59]your existential purpose is.
[00:04:01]Why are you here? [00:04:02]What makes your life meaningful? [00:04:05]Regardless of what name we give to it. [00:04:07]Vocation calling, ikigai [00:04:09]swadharma or something else,
[00:04:11]that existential purpose sits [00:04:13]and what we might call [00:04:14]the heart [00:04:15]of our systematic philosophy diagram. [00:04:17]Like everything else in the diagram,
[00:04:19]it changes [00:04:20]throughout the course of our lives, [00:04:22]but it changes far [00:04:23]less than our emotions [00:04:24]and states of mind, etc..
[00:04:26]So that's the big picture of Chapter [00:04:28]four setting course. [00:04:30]Now, I wanna zoom back in a little bit [00:04:32]and the first half of this chapter, [00:04:33]we talked about this kid
[00:04:35]named Siddartha Gautama, [00:04:36]and he had a profound [00:04:37]existential crisis [00:04:39]when he was about 20 years old or so. [00:04:41]He was surrounded
[00:04:42]by people who were suffering. [00:04:44]And there didn't seem to be any logic [00:04:45]or reason [00:04:46]or justification [00:04:47]as to why some people had lives
[00:04:49]filled with suffering [00:04:50]and others had lives of privilege, [00:04:52]wealth and opportunity. [00:04:54]He felt like nothing mattered in life. [00:04:56]So he got depressed
[00:04:58]and he sat under a tree. [00:05:00]In other words, [00:05:01]he felt empty and aimless [00:05:03]because he didn't have [00:05:04]an existential purpose,
[00:05:06]raison d'etre, or reason for being. [00:05:09]But through philosophy, [00:05:11]he discovered his existential purpose. [00:05:14]Now his logic went something like this. [00:05:16]Step one Suffering is bad.
[00:05:18]Step two Alleviating suffering is good. [00:05:22]Step three [00:05:23]If you spend this moment right now [00:05:25]alleviating someone else's suffering, [00:05:27]then this moment right now
[00:05:29]becomes meaningful, [00:05:30]purposeful, significant, and worthwhile. [00:05:33]Step four Repeat. [00:05:35]Step three [00:05:36]The more moments
[00:05:37]you spend doing something meaningful, [00:05:39]the more meaningful your life becomes. [00:05:41]What I want to do now [00:05:42]is dive into three different [00:05:44]but closely related
[00:05:45]philosophical insights from the Buddha. [00:05:48]First, let's zoom out [00:05:49]from our [00:05:50]diagram of systematic philosophy. [00:05:52]Next,
[00:05:52]we're going to shift our focus [00:05:54]and zoom in [00:05:55]on three aspects of the Buddha's [00:05:56]teaching anthropology, [00:05:58]ontology and epistemology.
[00:06:01]As we learned in Chapter one, [00:06:02]anthropology is the branch of philosophy [00:06:04]that asks, What does it mean to be human? [00:06:07]Another way to ask this question is [00:06:09]Who am I?
[00:06:10]Or What's the nature of the self? [00:06:13]Now, here [00:06:13]we'll look at what's [00:06:14]usually called [00:06:15]the Buddha's
[00:06:16]doctrine of anAtman or “no Self,” [00:06:19]as we'll see, [00:06:20]Buddha gives us a radically different way [00:06:22]to understand [00:06:23]what we mean by the words
[00:06:25]birth and death. [00:06:27]At the exact same time, I want to zoom in [00:06:29]on the Buddha's ontology, [00:06:31]as we learned in Chapter one. [00:06:32]Ontology is the branch of philosophy
[00:06:34]that investigates [00:06:35]the meaning of the word “being.” [00:06:38]What does it mean [00:06:39]for something to be or to exist? [00:06:42]Here, too, the Buddha
[00:06:43]gives us a lot to think about. [00:06:45]We'll look at what's referred to [00:06:46]as the Buddhist doctrine of pratityasamutpada, [00:06:49]which we can loosely translate [00:06:51]as the doctrine of “mutual arising”
[00:06:54]at the exact same time. [00:06:56]We're also going to focus [00:06:57]on the Buddhist epistemology. [00:06:59]As we learned in Chapter two, [00:07:00]Epistemology is the branch of philosophy
[00:07:02]that focuses on the nature of knowing. [00:07:05]How do we know what we know? [00:07:07]How does knowledge [00:07:07]and perception actually work? [00:07:10]Now why am I going to teach
[00:07:11]all of these [00:07:11]three complex [00:07:13]doctrines at the exact same time? [00:07:16]The reason is, [00:07:17]you really can't separate them.
[00:07:19]To understand one, [00:07:20]you have to understand all three. [00:07:22]Now, I'm going to be honest with you. [00:07:24]What I'm about to teach [00:07:25]is complex and difficult.
[00:07:27]I'm going to move step by step [00:07:29]and try to lead you [00:07:30]towards understanding, [00:07:31]using the same process [00:07:33]that the Buddha used.
[00:07:34]But in order to follow it, [00:07:36]you'll need to pay close attention. [00:07:38]If you get confused along the way, [00:07:40]don't sweat it. [00:07:41]Confusion is normal
[00:07:42]and an essential stage [00:07:44]in learning something new. [00:07:46]Just keep taking notes following along [00:07:48]and the light bulb [00:07:49]will eventually come on for you
[00:07:51]if you remain attentive. [00:07:53]So if you need a mental break, [00:07:55]then now would be a good time [00:07:56]to hit the pause button [00:07:57]and come back when you're ready.
[00:07:59][groans] It’s a good time to stretch, too! [00:08:02]Siddhartha Gautama, [00:08:03]as I mentioned before, [00:08:04]I lived around 500 BCE. [00:08:07]About 700 years later,
[00:08:08]this brilliant philosopher [00:08:10]and poet called Asvaghosa [00:08:12]wrote a long poem [00:08:13]about the Buddha's life and teachings. [00:08:15]Now, this poem is called
[00:08:16]the Buddhacarita [00:08:18]I mention it [00:08:18]because most of what I'm about to teach [00:08:20]you comes from that poem. In Canto [00:08:23]three of that poem
[00:08:24]Asvaghosa tells the same basic story [00:08:26]that I told in the previous video. [00:08:28]Siddhartha grew up in a privileged [00:08:30]and sheltered environment. [00:08:31]One day as an adult, he left his palace
[00:08:34]In Asvaghosa’s version, [00:08:36]Siddhartha was a passenger in a chariot. [00:08:40]We'll come back to that much [00:08:41]later in this philosophical quest. [00:08:43]Now, when he leaves this palace
[00:08:44]in his chariot, [00:08:46]he sees an old person, [00:08:47]then a person with disability, [00:08:49]and then a group of mourners [00:08:50]at a funeral.
[00:08:51]As a result, he gets depressed. [00:08:53]He has an existential crisis [00:08:55]and he sits under a tree [00:08:56]for about two weeks without eating. [00:08:59]In Canto 14, Asvaghosa walks us
[00:09:02]through logically, [00:09:03]carefully, meticulously [00:09:05]through Siddhartha, [00:09:05]his thought process [00:09:06]as he was sitting under that tree.
[00:09:09]Now, for context, don't [00:09:10]forget what we said earlier. [00:09:11]Suffering is bad. [00:09:13]Alleviating suffering is good. [00:09:15]So, Siddhartha,
[00:09:15]his next question [00:09:16]is what causes suffering? [00:09:18]If we can figure out [00:09:19]the cause of suffering, [00:09:20]then we can remove the cause.
[00:09:23]Sometimes the cause is super obvious. [00:09:25]Let's say this person is suffering [00:09:27]because they're starving. [00:09:28]They're starving [00:09:29]because they don't have food.
[00:09:30]Give them food. [00:09:31]Suffering is removed. [00:09:32]Easy. Or: This person is hurt. [00:09:35]They're suffering from wounds or disease. [00:09:38]Treat the wounds. Heal the disease.
[00:09:40]Suffering is removed, [00:09:42]but sometimes [00:09:44]suffering runs deeper [00:09:45]and is more psychological [00:09:46]and philosophical.
[00:09:47]Like nihilistic depression [00:09:49]and existential angst or anxiety. [00:09:52]So let's try [00:09:53]and trace the cause [00:09:54]of those kinds of suffering.
[00:09:57]With that in mind, [00:09:58]let's go back to “classroom Brad” from 2022. [00:10:01]I've added some slightly better graphics [00:10:04]with references to specific verses [00:10:06]in Asvaghosa's Buddhacarita,
[00:10:08]which mostly line up [00:10:09]with what I was teaching. [00:10:10]I add that in case [00:10:10]anyone wants to go back [00:10:12]and read that beautiful poem,
[00:10:13]which I'm happy to supply. [00:10:17]Okay, let's go a little bit deeper [00:10:18]into Buddha. [00:10:19]so He had a little bit more realization [00:10:22]than just this
[00:10:23]although this is a good realization [00:10:25]isn't it. [00:10:26]the word Buddha [00:10:27]We should start there, I guess. [00:10:28]So “buddhi” means
[00:10:30]“intellect.” What does the intellect do? [00:10:33]The intellect [00:10:34]is the part of the human person [00:10:35]that makes decisions. [00:10:37]the other day
[00:10:38]when we were talking about phenomenology [00:10:40]we talked about that “conscious I.” [00:10:42]And then there's the phenomenon. [00:10:44]Where is the phenomenon? [00:10:45]There's the thing itself.
[00:10:47]Good. [00:10:49]There's the phenomenon. [00:10:50]Where is the phenomena? [00:10:52]Yeah. Up here. [00:10:54]Right.
[00:10:54]It’s what we're conscious of -- it's [00:10:55]the object of the conscious mind [00:10:58]the object of the conscious mind. [00:11:01]So when we're asleep, [00:11:02]Or dreaming or imagining or daydreaming,
[00:11:05]then this is it, right? [00:11:07]We're conscious of whatever's [00:11:09]in our head, right? [00:11:10]Whatever phenomenon, [00:11:11]whatever's in our head,
[00:11:12]that's what we're conscious of. [00:11:14]It doesn't [00:11:14]necessarily have to correspond [00:11:16]to something outside, right? [00:11:19]Some sensual
[00:11:21]object out in the world, [00:11:23]So sometimes there's a correspondence [00:11:27]between these two [00:11:28]and sometimes there's not. [00:11:30]Like when I talk about my keys,
[00:11:32]my keys are there, [00:11:33]and I don't see my keys. [00:11:34]So the keys are there to be seen, but [00:11:38]my “conscious I” doesn't [00:11:39]see the phenomenon of the keys
[00:11:41]or when we saw the snake. [00:11:43]the snake that wasn't there, [00:11:45]There was a rope that was there. [00:11:47]But a snake appeared in the mind. [00:11:49]as the object of consciousness.
[00:11:50]So sometimes there's a correlation [00:11:52]between these two [00:11:53]and sometimes there's not, [00:11:54]which was why we talked about it [00:11:56]in chapter two.
[00:11:56]And the whole point of chapter [00:11:57]two was what? [00:11:59]How do we know what we know? [00:12:00]How do we know what we know? [00:12:01]So how do we know
[00:12:02]what we're seeing in our head corresponds [00:12:05]to what's out there in the world or not. [00:12:07]And the answer to that is phenomenology, [00:12:09]Phenomenological method, [00:12:10]that sort of thing.
[00:12:11]but now we're kind of [00:12:12]talking a little bit more, [00:12:13]we're moving a little bit more [00:12:15]in this direction, and “buddhi” [00:12:17]the “buddhi” one more step.
[00:12:18]so now we've got four columns here. [00:12:21]The Buddha, [00:12:22]this word, comes from this word, [00:12:24]which means, [00:12:25]the one who's fully awake, right?
[00:12:27]We had these different states [00:12:28]of consciousness [00:12:29]that we went through -- the “chaturpad., [00:12:31]What were those [00:12:32]four states of consciousness?
[00:12:35]Yeah. [00:12:36]Enlightenment at the top. [00:12:37]The ordinary waking state and deep sleep. [00:12:41]So enlightenment. [00:12:42]That's the “buddhi” - The Buddha.
[00:12:44]“Buddha-state” “Buddha-hood” or [00:12:48]“Buddha-ness” [00:12:50]It's a state of total awareness. [00:12:53]“Buddha” = [00:12:54]just means “The Enlightened One.”
[00:12:56]It's like the lights being turned on. [00:12:58]The this word enlightenment, actually. [00:13:01]the “light” there is super important. [00:13:04]The way that, another philosopher, [00:13:06]another philosopher named Shankara,
[00:13:07]from the eighth century. [00:13:09]CE Shankara explained it like this, [00:13:14]if you've got an object there, [00:13:17]like, let's say the marker. [00:13:18]The marker is there.
[00:13:19]You can see it, obviously, [00:13:21]If there was no light in here at all, [00:13:24]if all the lights were off [00:13:25]and I moved it somewhere. [00:13:27]And it was completely black, No
[00:13:29]light from the windows or anything. [00:13:30]It was a completely black, [00:13:32]then you would have [00:13:32]no idea where I put it [00:13:34]The marker would still be there.
[00:13:36]Right? It didn't stop existing. [00:13:38]When the lights are off [00:13:39]still there, you just can't see it [00:13:42]when the lights are off. [00:13:42]So you need some sort of light source
[00:13:45]in order to see that external thing. [00:13:48]So you need light [00:13:49]shining on the sensual object [00:13:51]in order to create this phenomenon [00:13:54]in our head,
[00:13:55]which in order to see it [00:13:56]with our conscious mind. [00:13:58]But like we said, [00:13:59]sometimes you can see something [00:14:01]-- somebody can point to something
[00:14:03]-- and you still don't see it, [00:14:04]So it could be like, [00:14:06]Hey, look, your keys are right there [00:14:07]and you still don't see them, right? [00:14:09]That example
[00:14:10]or sometimes, [00:14:11]you know, more abstractly, [00:14:12]if someone's explaining something to you, [00:14:15]Especially a philosophical idea [00:14:16]or something, they can explain it to you.
[00:14:19]But you still don't understand it, right? [00:14:20]The lights don't come on. [00:14:22]You don't get it. [00:14:22]You don't see it, Right. [00:14:24]when you're in math class
[00:14:25]or something like that, [00:14:27]you ever have something [00:14:29]where, like, [00:14:29]your math teacher [00:14:30]is trying to explain something
[00:14:31]and you just don't get it [00:14:33]and then all of a [00:14:33]sudden something clicks and you get it? [00:14:37]What do you say when that happens? [00:14:42]So, like.
[00:14:44]The light bulb went on. [00:14:46]Light bulb, right? [00:14:47]Or you say, Oh, “I see now.” Oh, I see. [00:14:51]“Now I see.” So [00:14:52]because the light bulb went on
[00:14:54]so that the light bulb goes on and I see. [00:14:57]So that light is like this light here [00:15:00]where you have [00:15:01]a more profound understanding [00:15:03]-- an intellectual understanding,
[00:15:04]not just the rational understanding. [00:15:06]Cool? [00:15:07]okay, [00:15:07]so let's get a little bit more [00:15:09]to his rational understanding.
[00:15:11]he was concerned about suffering [00:15:14]So he's trying to follow logically. [00:15:17]the first person [00:15:18]he saw was an old woman, right? [00:15:20]An old woman who was begging for food.
[00:15:22]She couldn't hear, [00:15:23]she couldn't see, Right. [00:15:25]Begging for food. [00:15:25]And then he saw [00:15:26]a person who was, sick or disabled.
[00:15:30]and then he saw mourners, [00:15:32]And was conscious [00:15:33]of the reality of death. [00:15:34]And he thought, okay, [00:15:36]what's the cause of these things?
[00:15:38]is there one thing that we can point to [00:15:40]that is the cause [00:15:42]of all three of these things? [00:15:44]What's required for a death to happen? [00:15:47]life, Right?
[00:15:48]So, and what's where does life come from? [00:15:52]What's the beginning of life? [00:15:55]so Birth. [00:15:57]So birth causes death for sure. [00:16:00]birth sometimes causes sickness.
[00:16:02]Can’t have sickness [00:16:03]unless there's a birth and old age, [00:16:05]if you're lucky. Right? [00:16:06]So old age sickness [00:16:08]and death are caused by birth.
[00:16:10]Without a birth, [00:16:11]there's none of these things. Right? [00:16:13]Then what is [00:16:16]birth caused by [00:16:21]Yeah.
[00:16:23]Birth is caused by sex. [00:16:27]Look at that. [00:16:27]It's like up there, right? [00:16:29]birth is caused by sex. [00:16:31]What causes sex?
[00:16:37]Sure. [00:16:37]Yeah. [00:16:38]Lust or desire, right? [00:16:40]Yeah. [00:16:41]Unfortunately, there are some more steps
[00:16:43]between desire and sex. Right. [00:16:45]I’m still working on those steps, [00:16:48]but, Ultimately, it comes down to desire. [00:16:51]If there's no desire, [00:16:52]then there's not going to be any sex.
[00:16:54]Right? [00:16:54]and so what causes [00:16:57]desire? Hormones, those sort of things. [00:17:00]But, at the most logical level, [00:17:02]there's no rhyme
[00:17:03]or reason to my color scheme. [00:17:04]desire is caused by sensuality. [00:17:07]By sensuality what I mean? [00:17:15]I don't mean like romance [00:17:18]and candles and flowers and chianti,
[00:17:22]but Yeah, [00:17:23]seeing, hearing, tasting, touching. [00:17:26]Right. [00:17:26]Your five senses. [00:17:28]So we desire things that we see.
[00:17:30]We desire [00:17:31]things that we hear, [00:17:33]We desire things that we smell, [00:17:35]So our desire comes from seeing things [00:17:38]that we want, right?
[00:17:39]you ever had it where [00:17:41]you know, [00:17:41]you're not [00:17:42]you're not particularly hungry, right? [00:17:44]Not like, particularly hungry.
[00:17:46]And then all of a sudden [00:17:47]you smell something that's, like, [00:17:50]smells really, really good. [00:17:51]And you're like, Okay, now I'm hungry. [00:17:53]That's why I'm so hungry now.
[00:17:57]Yeah. [00:17:57]So that desire begins with our sensation, [00:18:01]sensuality, and what causes [00:18:05]our sensuality? [00:18:06]We're getting more philosophical,
[00:18:07]maybe sensuality caused by our sense [00:18:11]organs, So seeing is caused by our eyes [00:18:15]hearing caused by our ears, etc.. [00:18:19]but as we’ve already shown, [00:18:22]sometimes my eyes can see
[00:18:24]something like my keys. [00:18:26]My keys might be there, [00:18:28]but I don't see them. Right. [00:18:30]It could be like, [00:18:32]We went through that the other day.
[00:18:33]this is like [00:18:35]critically important. [00:18:37]Change happens right here, actually. [00:18:40]Right there. [00:18:41]What happens after this point?
[00:18:43]The light doesn't go into your brain. [00:18:46]What what happens at this point? [00:18:48]do the signals get there? [00:18:49]So neurotransmitters [00:18:51]which travel along nerve cells.
[00:18:53]electrical signals travel [00:18:54]along those nerve cells [00:18:56]in the case of the eye, [00:18:57]they go to your visual [00:18:59]cortex is at the back of the brain
[00:19:01]link back here. [00:19:02]Then what does your brain do [00:19:03]as your visual cortex do? [00:19:05]Basically it recreates this, right? [00:19:08]It recreates an image, your brain
[00:19:11]constructs an image of the world [00:19:14]that sees out there. Right. [00:19:15]So sometimes something can be visible, [00:19:19]Visible is different than seeing it. [00:19:21]or your Math teacher
[00:19:22]explained something and it's like, Well, [00:19:23]I don't see it I don't get it right. [00:19:26]It's still gettable. [00:19:27]It's still seeable. [00:19:28]I just haven't seen it yet. Right.
[00:19:29]So just because something is visible [00:19:32]doesn't mean that we see it, right? [00:19:34]So there's got to be [00:19:35]some sort of cognition behind it, [00:19:38]So that our sense organs.
[00:19:41]Right. [00:19:41]We did this whole thing here, right. [00:19:44]So just because there's some phenomenon, [00:19:46]So there's some sensual object [00:19:48]and then we see that
[00:19:49]which creates this phenomenon. [00:19:51]Although that phenomenon [00:19:53]can also be created [00:19:53]by our imagination [00:19:55]or our memories or that sort of thing.
[00:19:58]But that doesn't necessarily [00:19:59]mean that we see it. [00:20:00]Like if I'm distracted [00:20:02]and I don't see my keys, [00:20:03]or maybe I see a snake
[00:20:05]instead of the rope [00:20:06]that's actually there. [00:20:07]So this process here, these two [00:20:11]we can call cognition, right? [00:20:15]so cognition or a cognitive event,
[00:20:17]In order for there [00:20:18]to be a cognition, [00:20:20]there needs to be a cognition [00:20:21]of something. [00:20:22]So if you see something
[00:20:24]and you can't make sense of it [00:20:25]or you don't know what it is, [00:20:26]then you say, What is that? [00:20:29]Because you can't [00:20:30]cognitively appraise it.
[00:20:31]So you're like, [00:20:32]Help me out, [00:20:33]What is it, Mom or dad [00:20:34]or teacher or whatever? Explain it to me. [00:20:36]if you're a kid,
[00:20:37]and you point to something and say, [00:20:39]what is that? [00:20:39]What kind of answer are you looking for? [00:20:41]what do you expect your parents to... [00:20:43]what kind of answer
[00:20:44]do you expect them to tell you? ... [00:20:45]a word. [00:20:47]Tell me: What's that thing called? [00:20:49]What’s the name of that thing? [00:20:50]What is that thing?
[00:20:51]And then they say, that's a dog [00:20:53]or that's a cat [00:20:54]or that's a Lotus [00:20:56]or Lamborghini or something. [00:20:57]they give you some word,
[00:20:59]so what are the things that we are [00:21:01]cognitive of? [00:21:03]So they can take the form of [00:21:05]a visible image. [00:21:06]something that we can see in our heads,
[00:21:08]like the snake that we see in our heads [00:21:11]that's not actually there, [00:21:12]we have an image of the snake [00:21:14]in our head. [00:21:14]we could have, sounds, too
[00:21:17]like I said the other day, [00:21:18]like you can hear a sound in your head, [00:21:20]you can hear your [00:21:22]grandfather's voice [00:21:23]maybe, or something like that.
[00:21:25]Even though they're not around, [00:21:26]you can hear that in your head or a song [00:21:28]that's a lullaby [00:21:29]that your mom saying [00:21:30]when you were a kid
[00:21:32]Or just a favorite song or whatever. [00:21:34]You can have [00:21:34]these sounds [00:21:35]that are [00:21:36]objects of your consciousness,
[00:21:37]so you can have feelings, [00:21:39]emotions, all these kind of things [00:21:41]can sort of be objects [00:21:42]of our consciousness, [00:21:43]But we also have names,
[00:21:46]So you could say, names and let's call [00:21:49]these things [00:21:52]forms. [00:21:53]so we are conscious of names and forms. [00:21:57]Okay.
[00:21:58]So in order for there to be a cognition, [00:22:01]the sense organs create these phenomena, [00:22:05]and the phenomenon is always [00:22:07]either a name or form. [00:22:11]A form
[00:22:12]something like a visual image [00:22:14]or a sound or a feeling or, a smell. [00:22:18]Whenever I think of my grandfather, [00:22:19]I think of the way he smelled. [00:22:21]Like, I didn't know him that well
[00:22:23]because he died when I was very young. [00:22:24]But I remember going to his house [00:22:25]and like going to his room [00:22:27]and there was a smell there, you know? [00:22:28]I mean, he was old,
[00:22:29]but that smell is very vivid in my mind, [00:22:33]even more than his face, actually. [00:22:34]I remember his smell [00:22:35]more than I remember his face. [00:22:36]so names and forms
[00:22:39]and these names and forms are the objects [00:22:43]of our conscious mind. [00:22:46]so that brings us around [00:22:47]to this “conscious [00:22:49]“conscious I”
[00:22:50]is always conscious of phenomena, [00:22:52]which are [00:22:53]always in the form of NAMES or FORMS [00:22:56]And so these phenomena are perceived [00:22:59]by the “conscious I”
[00:23:02]remember back [00:23:03]to those states of consciousness [00:23:05]in the waking state, [00:23:07]we've got cognitive [00:23:08]I, cognitive of phenomena
[00:23:11]which correspond to things [00:23:13]in the outside world. Dream state. [00:23:16]This part is happening, but they don't [00:23:18]there's not necessarily [00:23:19]any correspondence to things
[00:23:20]in the outside world, right? [00:23:22]Cognition is happening here, [00:23:24]but without correspondence [00:23:25]or also when we like see a snake, [00:23:28]when there's actually just a rope
[00:23:29]or when I don't see my keys, etc.. [00:23:32]So this is happening. [00:23:33]We call that the dream state. [00:23:35]So you don't have to be like asleep [00:23:37]for the dream state to happen, right?
[00:23:38]You just have to be distracted [00:23:40]or something like that. [00:23:41]but then there's another state. [00:23:42]So what's the other state? [00:23:46]So what, characterizes deep sleep?
[00:23:49]So this isn't happening, [00:23:51]There's no “conscious I”. [00:23:53]You're literally unconscious, right? [00:23:54]Or in a coma or you're out of it. [00:23:57]there's nothing going on here.
[00:23:59]there's nothing going on in his stupid [00:24:01]little head. [00:24:02]So in order [00:24:03]for the “conscious I” to manifest. [00:24:06]or to become visible
[00:24:08]then there needs to be something [00:24:10]of which it is conscious, right? [00:24:12]The conscious. [00:24:12]I must be conscious of something. [00:24:17]That's definitely something you should write down.
[00:24:19]The “conscious I” must be conscious of something. [00:24:23]What is it conscious of? [00:24:32]yeah, phenomena, names and forms. [00:24:34]Right. [00:24:35]Where do those names and forms exist?
[00:24:38]How do they exist? [00:24:39]What's the nature of their existence? [00:24:41]How do they exist? [00:24:43]Where do they exist? [00:24:44]Where do phenomena exist?
[00:24:46]Up here. [00:24:46]There's the thing itself. Good. [00:24:50]There's the phenomenon. [00:24:51]Right? Phenomena exist up here. [00:24:53]Where are they created?
[00:24:54]They're created by the mind. Right? [00:24:57]So phenomena exist [00:24:58]only as an object of consciousness, [00:25:01]and the “conscious [00:25:01]I” only becomes manifest
[00:25:03]when it's conscious of something. [00:25:05]Follow? [00:25:07]This is a big, important... [00:25:08]this is a big significant thing [00:25:09]that we're doing right here.
[00:25:11]Okay, [00:25:11]So the Buddha, [00:25:12]when he's trying to trace [00:25:14]the logical cause [00:25:15]of old age, sickness, and death,
[00:25:17]he's trying to trace the cause [00:25:19]of suffering or [00:25:21]he's trying [00:25:21]to trace the cause of everything [00:25:23]And he arrives here, right?
[00:25:24]So old age, [00:25:25]sickness and death are caused by birth, [00:25:27]which is caused by sex, [00:25:28]which is caused by desire, [00:25:29]which is caused by sensuality,
[00:25:30]which is caused by sense organs, [00:25:32]which produce phenomena in our head, [00:25:34]or correlate to phenomena in our head. [00:25:36]But those phenomena in our head [00:25:37]are created
[00:25:38]by our head, [00:25:39]created by a conscious mind [00:25:40]sometimes because they correlate [00:25:42]to things in the outside world. [00:25:43]When we're in the waking state
[00:25:44]and sometimes [00:25:45]not right when we're dreaming [00:25:47]or we're imagining things [00:25:49]So in either case, [00:25:50]they're still creations of the mind,
[00:25:52]either creations [00:25:53]that are [00:25:54]caused in some sense by the sense organs. [00:25:57]Hopefully if we're awake and alert [00:25:58]and paying attention, or not
[00:26:01]And in either case, [00:26:02]their existence [00:26:04]depends on the “conscious I.” [00:26:05]They don't exist [00:26:06]when you're not thinking of them.
[00:26:08]My keys exist, [00:26:09]whether we're looking at them or not. [00:26:11]But they only become a phenomenon [00:26:13]when you look at them, [00:26:14]It only becomes an object
[00:26:15]of conscious mind [00:26:17]when you're looking at them [00:26:19]or thinking of them. Right? [00:26:20]So just because the sensual thing exists [00:26:24]doesn't mean that it's a phenomenon.
[00:26:25]It only becomes a phenomenon [00:26:26]when it becomes an object [00:26:28]of the conscious mind. Make sense? [00:26:31]Yeah, totally. That makes sense. [00:26:32]That makes sense.
[00:26:33]So where do you go from here? [00:26:37]We've arrived at a loop, right? [00:26:39]This is caused by. This is caused by. [00:26:40]This is caused by. This is caused by. [00:26:42]This is caused by. This is caused by.
[00:26:43]This which is caused by this [00:26:46]So we've arrived at a circle, [00:26:48]If you've ever seen Zen Buddhist monks, [00:26:51]they just kind of draw [00:26:54]circles, form is emptiness, and emptiness
[00:26:56]is form or sunyata (in Sanskrit) [00:27:00]the emptiness of this process. [00:27:03]So the conscious “I” - this “ego,” [00:27:06]what we call “ego.” Who am I at [00:27:10]any given moment?
[00:27:12]Depends on [00:27:13]the phenomena that I'm aware of, [00:27:15]What I'm conscious of this is who I am. [00:27:19]I psychologically Philosophically, [00:27:23]I am the one that is
[00:27:24]conscious of this thing [00:27:26]at this moment, [00:27:27]which only exists [00:27:28]as an object of my consciousness. [00:27:30]This is it.
[00:27:31]Right [00:27:31]some other philosophers, [00:27:33]some other philosophies [00:27:34]said that behind this behind all of this. [00:27:38]There's another self,
[00:27:41]And that self is who I am, really Right. [00:27:45]What does the word real mean? [00:27:46]Are using the word real in this class. [00:27:47]un-changing, right? [00:27:50]So who is this “real I”
[00:27:52]Will the real Slim Shady please stand up. [00:27:54]Who is the real I? [00:27:55]The real self, That unchanging self. [00:27:58]But we already said, [00:28:00]I'm constantly changing all the time.
[00:28:02]So this idea that there's [00:28:03]some sort of self [00:28:05]which is unchanging, [00:28:06]that's the same, [00:28:07][name] The same [name]
[00:28:09]or the same [name] [00:28:10]or the same [name] from beginning to end [00:28:13]that you're always the same self [00:28:16]from beginning to end, right? [00:28:17]Even though
[00:28:19]who you are at any given [00:28:20]moment is always subject to change. [00:28:22]Right? so this is a common philosophy. [00:28:25]Buddha said here's [00:28:27]what the Buddha said and I'm paraphrasing
[00:28:29]the Buddha said the hypothesis of self [00:28:33]is logically unnecessary. [00:28:36]the doctrine is known as the doctrine of anAtman (no Self) [00:28:42]an meaning “no” and atman meaning self. [00:28:46]But it's really sort of this
[00:28:48]bigger, unchanging real, unchanging self. [00:28:52]So there is [00:28:53]this “I” [00:28:54]that's constantly changing every moment, [00:28:56]Any time we're conscious of something
[00:28:58]that's a different “conscious I” [00:29:01]But then the Atman [00:29:02]is that “unchanging [00:29:04]real Self” [00:29:05]that persists
[00:29:06]throughout all of those moments [00:29:07]of change. [00:29:08]And Buddha didn't say, [00:29:10]well, you can't disprove that. [00:29:12]Right? Buddha
[00:29:13]didn't say [00:29:14]what he really said was [00:29:15]that this self [00:29:17]is not logically necessary. Right? [00:29:19]You could believe it or not believe it,
[00:29:21]but it's a matter of belief. [00:29:23]It's not a matter of logic. [00:29:26]Makes sense? Solid? [00:29:29]Questions? Confusion? [00:29:33]Thoughts.?
[00:29:35]Got it. Cool cool? [00:29:36]Okay, [00:29:37]I know that was extremely confusing [00:29:39]and probably pretty [00:29:40]frustrating for some folks.
[00:29:42]So let me review a few points [00:29:44]and try to add some clarity. [00:29:45]Let's start at this absolutely key point [00:29:48]where something very significant happens [00:29:50]to make it a little bit easier.
[00:29:52]I'm going to focus on vision, [00:29:53]but the same points [00:29:54]that I'm going to make apply [00:29:55]to the other senses, [00:29:56]like hearing,
[00:29:57]tasting, touching and smelling. [00:29:59]When light enters our eyes [00:30:01]and the rods and cones [00:30:03]in our eyeballs convert [00:30:04]that light energy into sense data,
[00:30:07]this is super significant. [00:30:09]I can't overemphasize [00:30:10]how significant this is. [00:30:12]it's often called the cut [00:30:14]light stops in our eyeballs.
[00:30:15]It doesn't get to our brain. Right. [00:30:18]Instead, [00:30:18]the optic nerve sends [00:30:19]electrical impulses to our visual cortex, [00:30:22]which is kind of like
[00:30:23]a data processing computer [00:30:25]that takes all of that data and CREATES (key term!) a mental image [00:30:32]I heard this one [00:30:33]philosopher, tenured Duke professor [00:30:35]describe it like this.
[00:30:37]This is just an allegory, [00:30:38]but I think it's pretty helpful. [00:30:40]Let's imagine [00:30:40]that there's a movie theater [00:30:42]inside of your brain.
[00:30:44]Now, you could think about [00:30:45]your visual cortex, [00:30:46]sort of like the movie screen [00:30:48]and your auditory cortex [00:30:49]would be the speakers
[00:30:51]and the “conscious I” [00:30:52]or ego is like this [00:30:53]tiny little [00:30:54]you sitting in a chair alone [00:30:56]in this movie theater.
[00:30:57]Now that little you [00:30:59]sitting in the chair [00:31:00]watching this movie [00:31:01]thinks that the images it's watching [00:31:03]and the sounds that it's hearing
[00:31:05]are coming straight [00:31:06]from the outside world. [00:31:08]But they're not. [00:31:09]The images and sounds [00:31:10]and smells
[00:31:11]and sensations are actually created [00:31:13]by the brain. [00:31:15]Now, when everything is working properly, [00:31:17]then what [00:31:18]that little ego sees,
[00:31:19]hears and smells [00:31:20]does correspond to the sensible objects [00:31:23]out there in the world. [00:31:25]We've been calling this the waking state. [00:31:27]Now, sometimes
[00:31:28]when we're asleep, [00:31:29]the movies keep playing, [00:31:30]even though our eyes are closed. [00:31:32]All right. [00:31:33]What's on tonight, dream production.?
[00:31:34]We call those dreams. [00:31:36]But it's important [00:31:37]to remember two things. [00:31:38]First, [00:31:39]those dreams are created by our mind.
[00:31:42]Second, [00:31:43]the same exact thing is also happening [00:31:45]when we're awake. [00:31:47]Now, [00:31:47]what does all this have to do
[00:31:48]with Buddhist philosophy? [00:31:50]Well, the Buddha pointed out [00:31:51]a couple of important things. [00:31:53]First, that the conscious eye, [00:31:55]the little dude in the chair,
[00:31:56]is necessarily conscious of something. [00:31:59]It can't be conscious [00:32:00]unless there's something [00:32:01]to be conscious of. [00:32:03]If there's nothing to be conscious of,
[00:32:06]then it will create it. [00:32:08]Why does that matter? [00:32:09]Well, it means that the “conscious I” is [00:32:12]ontologically dependent upon phenomena. [00:32:15]Big words.
[00:32:17]Second, the phenomena [00:32:18]of which [00:32:19]the “conscious I” is [00:32:20]conscious are creations [00:32:22]of that conscious I.
[00:32:23]They only exist as objects [00:32:25]of the conscious mind. [00:32:27]That means that the phenomena [00:32:28]are ontologically dependent [00:32:30]upon the conscious I.
[00:32:32]Taken together, [00:32:33]that means that [00:32:33]the conscious “I” or “Ego” and [00:32:43]That's kind of a big deal. [00:32:45]In Sanskrit, this is called the doctrine of pratityasamutpada or “mutual arising.”
[00:32:50]So the next time someone says to you, [00:32:52]“That's just your subjective opinion,” [00:32:54]or “Let's look at this objectively,” [00:32:57]then you can explain to them that [00:32:58]subject and object are mutually constitutive correlates that ontologically arise together and depend upon one another for their being.
[00:33:09]This means that [00:33:09]there is an ontological codependence [00:33:11]of mind and thought. [00:33:13]Ontological co-dependence [00:33:15]means that one can't exist
[00:33:17]without the other. [00:33:17]They depend on one [00:33:19]another for their existence. [00:33:20]My mind is my ego, [00:33:25]This is what I'm referring to.
[00:33:26]I am a knower, [00:33:28]but I can't be a knower [00:33:30]unless I know something. [00:33:32]So being a knower ontologically depends on knowledge. [00:33:36]But that knowledge
[00:33:37]is not just something in my brain. [00:33:40]It's a part of me. [00:33:41]I am what I know. [00:33:43]What I know is a part of me. [00:33:45]To be a thinker means to have thoughts.
[00:33:48]But those thoughts are phenomena [00:33:49]that are created by me. [00:33:51]I can't be a dreamer [00:33:52]unless I have a dream. [00:33:54]But the dream is mine.
[00:33:56]It's me. [00:33:57]I can't remember [00:33:58]unless I remember some memory. [00:34:00]But my memories are who I am. [00:34:03]They're a part of me.
[00:34:05]The memories depend [00:34:07]and the rememberER [00:34:09]Can't remember without the memory. [00:34:12]Which again is me. [00:34:14]But it also means that who
[00:34:16]I am at [00:34:17]any given moment is constantly changing [00:34:20]because the nature of my “self” [00:34:22]as a conscious perceiver [00:34:23]ontologically depends
[00:34:24]upon the phenomena [00:34:25]that I consciously perceive [00:34:27]at any given moment. [00:34:29]In the doctrine of anAtman (or no Self) [00:34:31]Buddha said that it's fine
[00:34:32]to believe that [00:34:33]there's a real “I” - a Self [00:34:36]that I always am, a me [00:34:38]that never changes. [00:34:39]But his philosophy demonstrates
[00:34:41]that it is logically unnecessary. [00:34:44]Today there are Buddhists [00:34:45]who believe in the self [00:34:47]and there are Buddhists [00:34:48]who don't believe in the self.
[00:34:49]The Buddha argued [00:34:50]that the hypothesis [00:34:51]of an unchanging, [00:34:53]enduring self is logically unnecessary. [00:34:56]I can believe that
[00:34:57]there's a Brad [00:34:58]that always is and forever the same. [00:35:02]But the only thing we have evidence for [00:35:04]is that Brad is a conscious perceiver [00:35:07]that is in a constant state of change.
[00:35:10]In fact, [00:35:11]Buddha follows the logic [00:35:12]even one step further. [00:35:14]Since I am in a constant state of change, [00:35:17]since the conscious,
[00:35:17]I is ontologically dependent [00:35:19]upon the phenomena [00:35:20]I perceive at any given moment. [00:35:22]Then I die and I am born again [00:35:27]and again and again.
[00:35:28]From moment to moment, [00:35:30]from breath to breath. [00:35:32]In other words, [00:35:33]Buddha [00:35:33]radically reinterprets
[00:35:35]the words birth and death [00:35:37]in the same way that a river changes [00:35:40]from moment to moment. [00:35:41]So, too, who [00:35:42]I am changes
[00:35:44]as my stream of consciousness changes. [00:35:47]In fact, the goal of Buddhist meditation [00:35:50]is to be still, to be still enough [00:35:53]to observe the cycle of birth [00:35:55]and death that arises and passes
[00:35:57]with each moment and each breath [00:36:01]by radically but logically. [00:36:03]Reinterpreting ontology, epistemology, [00:36:06]anthropology, birth and death. [00:36:08]The Buddha helps us to clear out
[00:36:09]all that mental clutter and focus [00:36:12]on what truly matters, which is who I am [00:36:15]right here and right now. [00:36:19]So to summarize, [00:36:20]as Buddha
[00:36:21]explained, who I am [00:36:23]is both the conscious perceiver [00:36:25]and the phenomena [00:36:26]that I perceive [00:36:27]these two mutually arise
[00:36:29]and ontologically [00:36:30]depend upon one another. [00:36:32]This means that [00:36:33]the answer to the question Who am I? [00:36:35]Changes with every moment.
[00:36:37]Every moment one Brad dies [00:36:40]and another Brad is born [00:36:42]and I can give purpose and meaning [00:36:44]to each and every moment by observing it, [00:36:47]honoring it, appreciating it,
[00:36:49]being aware of it. [00:36:50]And whenever the opportunity arises, [00:36:53]use it to alleviate suffering. [00:36:55]The last thing I want to add [00:36:57]is about enlightenment.
[00:36:58]Enlightenment or Buddha-hood or Nirvana [00:37:01]is not some state that a person [00:37:03]attains once and for all. [00:37:05]Rather, it's a state of total awareness. [00:37:07]It's a state of being fully attentive
[00:37:10]to the birth and death of the ego [00:37:12]with each passing moment [00:37:14]and fully attentive to the sense data [00:37:16]that streaming in through our eyes, [00:37:18]ears, nose, mouth and skin,
[00:37:21]the phenomenal content [00:37:22]of our conscious perception [00:37:24]define who we are. [00:37:26]And if we minimize the role [00:37:28]that our ego plays in that process,
[00:37:30]then we become in a very real way, [00:37:34]identified with something [00:37:35]infinitely larger [00:37:37]than that lonely little dude sitting in the CAVE of the movie theater in our heads. [00:37:43]let's try and think about sex.
[00:37:45]want to talk about the relationship [00:37:46]between sex and death. [00:37:49]what's the point of sex [00:37:50]And what's the point of reproduction [00:37:52]Because
[00:37:55]we're going to die, right? [00:37:57]So intercourse creates life. [00:38:00]It's procreative, [00:38:01]It makes more life [00:38:03]so that life can keep going.
[00:38:04]Because the life that's here [00:38:06]is going to die. Straightforward, right? [00:38:09]So then Sex is a way to transcend [00:38:13]Sex is a kind of genesis. [00:38:15]It's a kind of creation
[00:38:17]a procreation [00:38:18]or creation of a new being Freud [00:38:21]talks about the sex drive [00:38:22]and the death drive. Right. [00:38:23]We have this
[00:38:24]this drive for sex, [00:38:26]which is [00:38:27]to make sure that we have intercourse, [00:38:29]which is to make sure that we procreate [00:38:32]so that there's life after we die.
[00:38:35]And when we were talking about this [00:38:37]in chapter two, [00:38:38]we talked about the unzipping [00:38:41]and the re-zipping. [00:38:42]So you've got half of your DNA
[00:38:45]gets passed on to the next generation [00:38:49]or whatever, So it's not me. [00:38:51]My kids aren't me, [00:38:52]but they're not “not-me.” mean, I'm fine. [00:38:55]I can swim,
[00:38:56]you know, [00:38:56]but I'm certainly not going to win [00:38:58]any like, swim races. [00:38:59]on the one day [00:39:02]that it really mattered, on the one day
[00:39:05]where the race [00:39:06]actually counted on that one day [00:39:10]I was the fastest swimmer [00:39:12]as are you, right? [00:39:14]They can't become human
[00:39:16]without having been the fastest swimmer [00:39:19]on that one day that really mattered. [00:39:21]sex is the creation, it's [00:39:23]the genesis is the beginning, [00:39:25]that begins
[00:39:25]with the fastest swimmer [00:39:27]and then ends at death [00:39:29]So death is the end of all possibilities. [00:39:33]Sex is the actualization [00:39:36]of the first possibility. Yeah, fine.
[00:39:39]Oh. [00:39:40]I'm a little confused [00:39:41]because I don't always think that [00:39:43]it's like Yeah. [00:39:45]I mean,
[00:39:46]not arguing against any of that, right? [00:39:48]But nevertheless, [00:39:49]biologically, there's a drive, [00:39:51]like a hormonal drive to reproduce, [00:39:55]which is largely due to the fact that
[00:39:57]organisms die. Isn’t it? [00:40:00]what are we [00:40:01]Or because it can make life meaningful, [00:40:03]And part of the way [00:40:03]it can make life meaningful
[00:40:05]is because there's a part of me [00:40:06]that's here after I'm [00:40:08]dead, Something [00:40:08]that's going to live on after me. [00:40:12]I mean, I'm not arguing against you.
[00:40:14]Take all your points, the [00:40:18]So yeah, so [00:40:18]I'm not arguing against anything [00:40:20]that you just said, right? [00:40:21]Anything that either of you just said.
[00:40:23]But my point is simply, [00:40:24]is that philosophy begins [00:40:26]with a meaningful reflection on death. [00:40:28]And that reflection on death [00:40:30]is always
[00:40:31]going to be inextricably [00:40:32]linked from a discussion about sex, [00:40:36]that sex and death go hand in hand [00:40:39]in the Book of Genesis, in Genesis [00:40:42]Chapter three.
[00:40:43]Right. [00:40:43]Sex and death [00:40:44]are taught at the same time [00:40:45]that sex and death [00:40:46]are inextricably linked.
[00:40:48]Sex and death Are both revealed [00:40:50]at the same time. [00:40:51]Genesis chapter three, [00:40:52]this is the first time [00:40:53]that we're introduced
[00:40:54]in the text [00:40:55]to the ideas of death and sex. [00:40:58]And they both come at the same time, [00:41:00]There's these two trees. [00:41:01]One is the tree of life.
[00:41:02]And if you don't eat of the tree of life, [00:41:04]then you die. [00:41:05]And the other is the tree [00:41:06]of knowledge of good and evil, [00:41:08]you know, philosophy and ethics,
[00:41:10]And once they eat of [00:41:12]the tree of knowledge [00:41:13]of good [00:41:14]and bad or ethics, [00:41:15]once they learn about ethics,
[00:41:16]then they also recognize, [00:41:19]the ethical implications of sex [00:41:21]And then that also closes them off [00:41:22]from the Tree of Life. [00:41:23]So sex and death are usually directly
[00:41:26]accompanied with one another [00:41:27]when we teach, most cultures [00:41:29]teach them together [00:41:30]because they're, [00:41:31]bookends in this sort of way,
[00:41:33]death of one [00:41:34]and the beginning of another. [00:41:36]So sex and death [00:41:37]in religious philosophies [00:41:38]and nonreligious philosophies,
[00:41:40]Have always been inextricably linked. [00:41:43]And I'm just trying [00:41:43]to get us to think about it [00:41:45]a little bit more scientifically, [00:41:47]a little bit
[00:41:47]more biologically, [00:41:48]and recognize that there's [00:41:49]a deep [00:41:50]psychological, biological, hormonal [00:41:54]relationship between these two things.
[00:41:56]sex is a way to transcend death [00:41:59]by continuing one's DNA [00:42:02]into the next generation [00:42:03]sperm donor or whatever. [00:42:05]Okay.
[00:42:05]But in that, just sex with more steps. [00:42:09]But ultimately, what do we mean by sex? [00:42:12]Do we mean the act of sex or do we mean [00:42:15]Sperm entering egg. [00:42:19]It's one. Fact.
[00:42:20]Yeah, that's right. [00:42:24]Yeah. [00:42:25]I'm not saying that the point of sex is [00:42:28]the idea. [00:42:28]That's not even what it says, right?
[00:42:30]Sex is a way to transcend death. [00:42:32]I'm not saying that. [00:42:32]That's the whole entire purpose of sex. [00:42:37]Yeah. All right. [00:42:38]Okay.
[00:42:39]I'm just saying that that is a way [00:42:42]to transcend death, Okay. [00:42:45]Okay, let's tie everything together [00:42:48]and put chapter four to bed. [00:42:50]We started with Mac Miller
[00:42:51]video called Self Care [00:42:53]and the Latin words [00:42:53]that he carved in his coffin. [00:42:55]Memento Mori. Remember death. [00:42:58]I gave the thesis statement
[00:42:59]of chapter four, [00:43:00]which is Philosophy [00:43:02]only begins with a meaningful reflection [00:43:04]on the reality of death. [00:43:06]Confronting the reality of death
[00:43:08]helps us to discover the possibilities [00:43:10]that we have right now [00:43:12]and the opportunities [00:43:12]that we have right now [00:43:14]to make life meaningful.
[00:43:16]Many people in our world today, [00:43:18]especially young people, struggle [00:43:20]with existential anxiety [00:43:22]and depression [00:43:23]that comes from a feeling
[00:43:24]that my life doesn't matter. [00:43:26]Nothing I'm going to do [00:43:27]is going to make any difference. [00:43:29]In this chapter, [00:43:30]I've tried to offer
[00:43:31]three major ways [00:43:32]to overcome that feeling. [00:43:34]First, [00:43:35]the Buddha helps us to see that [00:43:37]life is a series of individual moments.
[00:43:40]If you make this moment [00:43:41]meaningful by alleviating [00:43:43]the suffering of others, [00:43:44]by appreciating the beauty [00:43:46]of this particular moment
[00:43:48]and filling as many moments as we can [00:43:50]with things that matter, [00:43:52]then our life as a whole [00:43:55]will be filled [00:43:55]with meaning and purpose
[00:43:57]and significance of beauty. [00:43:58]Or like Pitbull said: “Feel this moment” [00:44:04]Second InterCourse. [00:44:06]I'm going to die. [00:44:07]But hopefully my kids continue
[00:44:09]to have a positive, [00:44:10]meaningful impact on the world [00:44:12]after I'm gone. [00:44:13]True, it isn't me, but it's not exactly. [00:44:17]Not-me.
[00:44:19]Third: DisCourse. [00:44:21]This is really about the last word [00:44:23]of my definition of philosophy, [00:44:25]which is philosophy [00:44:27]as a mode of discourse
[00:44:28]for the sake of training the intellect [00:44:30]by cultivating a desire [00:44:32]for truth, [00:44:33]wisdom, and justice through inSpiration. [00:44:36]Like many philosophers before me,
[00:44:38]I tried to draw as close [00:44:40]a comparison [00:44:40]as I possibly [00:44:41]could between Inter-Course and Dis-Course [00:44:44]in the same way
[00:44:45]that my genetic material [00:44:47]can continue [00:44:48]to have an impact in the world [00:44:49]after my death. [00:44:51]So too can my words.
[00:44:54]Maybe Marshall Mathers said it [00:44:55]best in his song. [00:44:56]“Sing for the Moment”: [00:44:57]Seize the moment, try to freeze it and own it. [00:45:00]Squeeze it and hold it, ‘cause we consider these minutes golden
[00:45:03]and maybe they'll admit it [00:45:04]when we're gone, [00:45:04]just let our spirits live on through the lyrics [00:45:06]that you hear in our songs. [00:45:07]And we can sing. Sing with me.
[00:45:09]Sing for the year. [00:45:10]Sing for the laughter, [00:45:12]Sing for the tear. [00:45:13]Sing it with me. [00:45:15]It's just for today.
[00:45:16]Maybe tomorrow, the good Lord will take you away. [00:45:22]Lastly, as we learn from Derrida, [00:45:25]our words communicate through passageways [00:45:28]of space time [00:45:29]long after our death
[00:45:31]to contexts that we can barely imagine, [00:45:33]and the meaning of our words [00:45:35]change beyond our control. [00:45:37]In the same way [00:45:38]that my kids will have an impact
[00:45:40]that is beyond my control. [00:45:41]Gandhi's words. [00:45:43]Gandhi's words were very inspirational [00:45:45]during his lifetime, [00:45:45]but they continue
[00:45:46]to inSpire people today. [00:45:48]Martin Luther King’s speeches [00:45:50]were very inSpirational [00:45:51]when he was alive, [00:45:52]but they continue
[00:45:53]to inSpire millions of humans today. [00:45:56]Jesus was an inSpirational person [00:45:58]and his words continue to inSpire today. [00:46:01]Socrates was inSpirational [00:46:02]and his words continue to inSpire today.
[00:46:05]Mac Miller was a beautiful soul [00:46:07]and a gifted artist, [00:46:09]and it's sad that he died so young. [00:46:11]But his words continue [00:46:13]to live on
[00:46:13]and his music continues to inSpire [00:46:16]all of these philosophers. [00:46:18]Buddha, [00:46:19]Socrates, Jesus, [00:46:20]Ghandi, Martin Luther King,
[00:46:22]Derrida and Mac Miller [00:46:23]have experienced [00:46:24]the utmost possibility [00:46:26]of the absolute impossibility. [00:46:28]And yet they transcend death
[00:46:32]because their words continue to inSpire [00:46:37]peace out,